What was the name of that tv show? I thought it was the Duggars' 18 and Counting but she doesn't have any children from a previous marriage. The one I am thinking of is the same type thing but with two children from before the mom and dad met.What is the name of the show about LOTS of kids but mom had two from previous marriage?
brady bunch ,What is the name of the show about LOTS of kids but mom had two from previous marriage?
Oh boy - I remember seeing a lot of those shows too, I'm wondering if the one you're talking about had the mom with the oldest daughter named Jemima? That's the only one that comes to mind at the moment. I don't remember the family name, but the show may have been Kids By the Dozen, where they highlight different families each time, not just one.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
Is is okay to touch my girlfriends breast before marriage?
My girlfriend wants me to touch her breast. I dont know why but she gets upset when i say no cuz we're christians and we're not married yet.
So issit a sin to do so before marriage?Is is okay to touch my girlfriends breast before marriage?
of course it aint a sin, youre just touchin' nothin' else.Is is okay to touch my girlfriends breast before marriage?
WTF????? breast have nothing to do with virginity or becoming of one flesh.
so touch, grab and kiss all u and all she wants
PEACE
I dont think its a sin.......because i think the bible says we should not fornicate (having sexual intercourse with someone who you are not married to)......the two of you should work it out and you guys should respect each other decision.....
It's not a sin it will be okay. And if you still feel bad about it just ask for forgiveness.
It isnt a sin to touch, only if there is masturbation or sexual contact under there...
Nothing in the Bible about heavy petting. Just don't it too far and ejaculate or your going to Hell!!!!!
no it's not a sin
touch the boobieblue makeup
So issit a sin to do so before marriage?Is is okay to touch my girlfriends breast before marriage?
of course it aint a sin, youre just touchin' nothin' else.Is is okay to touch my girlfriends breast before marriage?
WTF????? breast have nothing to do with virginity or becoming of one flesh.
so touch, grab and kiss all u and all she wants
PEACE
Report Abuse
I dont think its a sin.......because i think the bible says we should not fornicate (having sexual intercourse with someone who you are not married to)......the two of you should work it out and you guys should respect each other decision.....
It's not a sin it will be okay. And if you still feel bad about it just ask for forgiveness.
It isnt a sin to touch, only if there is masturbation or sexual contact under there...
Nothing in the Bible about heavy petting. Just don't it too far and ejaculate or your going to Hell!!!!!
no it's not a sin
touch the boobie
Why are threesomes viewed as being harmful to a marriage if the wife AND husband want to enjoy another woman?
Isn't it serving the same purpose (spicing things up, change %26amp; variety) as toys, props and role playing?Why are threesomes viewed as being harmful to a marriage if the wife AND husband want to enjoy another woman?
Because in general most people cannot deal with the 3rd person in the marriage. Husband may wonder if wife will ';turn'; gay and run off with woman and woman may wonder if husband will leave her for the other gal
etc
all comes down to most people don't have the emotional maturity to deal with such an advanced and complex social equation as introducing a 3rd member to what people are taught should be a monogamous relationship
but if it works for you then fine by me and if it doesn't then fine by meWhy are threesomes viewed as being harmful to a marriage if the wife AND husband want to enjoy another woman?
It depends on the couple. Some people see it as a threat to their marriage and thus should NOT participate in threesomes, etc. Others are more free in their sexuality and can separate love from sex and are able to enjoy such pleasures responsibly and maturely.
Being of the latter, I say it's a wonderful way to explore your sexuality if the couple in question is up to the challenge. It takes a strong and secure couple who can communicate openly and honestly and have 100% trust in each other to be able to pull it off. Plus they have to be into the kink lol.
They are viewed as harmful because they go against the prejudices taught in modern religion and societal norms about marriage. When it comes down to it only you and your partner can decide if it is harmful. If you trust each other and are firmly committed to one another then it should be fine.
Well... I don't know your views on the sanctity of marriage. And trust me, I am not judging!!! I answer with experience. It might not harm your relationship and it probably WILL spice things up if you are both for it. But as far as being ';VIEWED'; it's because it is a marriage... a commitment for the rest of your life to each other and no other. Once again, I'm not judging just answering why its ';viewed'; to be harmful
It's viewed as harmful because most married couples value the fact that you belong only to one another. Once that line is breached, there is a lack of trust and the relationship suffers and often fails.
they are viewed as harmful because most coules die on the vine
its really just a matter of 'be careful what you wish for because you may get it';.. it may sound all fine and dandy and some people handle it just fine but all it takes is one lingering glance to bring jealousies ugly head around. once you've thrown mistrust in your relationship or doubt its almost impossible to fix and it only is successful with a small percentage of relationships..
I honestly think the response from Tiffany is a good one.
For us males it is great with threesomes. Two beautiful ladies... (I am in heaven)...
And most likely it is a male behind these requests.
So if the male can accept threesomes with two males and one lady it is nothing to say about two ladies and one male... But otherwise... ok. for us males it is great... - We will definitely win most on it!
You are adding another person into the equation, with their feelings, actions, reactions and emotions. Last time I checked, toys and props didn't have feelings. Triangles have three sides!
You do what ever the heck you want to do in your bedroom.
What ever blows your hair back.
In case you are looking for traders, not interested.
Why does it have to be with another woman? I'd only have a threesome with another man, but not with another woman.
Because so many of the conservative, closeminded women (especially) on Y!A can't imagine doing anything like it, so it must be evil.
Generally one person becomes attached to the 3rd party and that's when the trouble begins...
I think you should do whatever floats your boat...
It's not harmful. That is the best arrangement in any marriage.
if it's something you both want and feel that your relationship will be fine afterward, then there is no problem=enjoy!
To each his /her own... if you as a couple are in agreement, then go for it and I hope it is as hot as it sounds.
Go have one and let me know how it turns out.
because its a) cheating b) being unfaithful to your vows c) if the female was gay she should never have gotten married d) if the man wanted to cheat he should have never gotten married e) its unsafe f) can get a STD g) it makes sex with each other seem less desireable h) its the highway to divorce i) your children (if any) dont need sl*ts for parents. j) word eventually gets around k) you get the well i cheated with you so i can cheat with out you l) where is the love between you two k) shall i go on???? i prob can make it thru the alphabet. if u want to chea go get divorced .
Because in general most people cannot deal with the 3rd person in the marriage. Husband may wonder if wife will ';turn'; gay and run off with woman and woman may wonder if husband will leave her for the other gal
etc
all comes down to most people don't have the emotional maturity to deal with such an advanced and complex social equation as introducing a 3rd member to what people are taught should be a monogamous relationship
but if it works for you then fine by me and if it doesn't then fine by meWhy are threesomes viewed as being harmful to a marriage if the wife AND husband want to enjoy another woman?
It depends on the couple. Some people see it as a threat to their marriage and thus should NOT participate in threesomes, etc. Others are more free in their sexuality and can separate love from sex and are able to enjoy such pleasures responsibly and maturely.
Being of the latter, I say it's a wonderful way to explore your sexuality if the couple in question is up to the challenge. It takes a strong and secure couple who can communicate openly and honestly and have 100% trust in each other to be able to pull it off. Plus they have to be into the kink lol.
They are viewed as harmful because they go against the prejudices taught in modern religion and societal norms about marriage. When it comes down to it only you and your partner can decide if it is harmful. If you trust each other and are firmly committed to one another then it should be fine.
Well... I don't know your views on the sanctity of marriage. And trust me, I am not judging!!! I answer with experience. It might not harm your relationship and it probably WILL spice things up if you are both for it. But as far as being ';VIEWED'; it's because it is a marriage... a commitment for the rest of your life to each other and no other. Once again, I'm not judging just answering why its ';viewed'; to be harmful
It's viewed as harmful because most married couples value the fact that you belong only to one another. Once that line is breached, there is a lack of trust and the relationship suffers and often fails.
they are viewed as harmful because most coules die on the vine
its really just a matter of 'be careful what you wish for because you may get it';.. it may sound all fine and dandy and some people handle it just fine but all it takes is one lingering glance to bring jealousies ugly head around. once you've thrown mistrust in your relationship or doubt its almost impossible to fix and it only is successful with a small percentage of relationships..
I honestly think the response from Tiffany is a good one.
For us males it is great with threesomes. Two beautiful ladies... (I am in heaven)...
And most likely it is a male behind these requests.
So if the male can accept threesomes with two males and one lady it is nothing to say about two ladies and one male... But otherwise... ok. for us males it is great... - We will definitely win most on it!
You are adding another person into the equation, with their feelings, actions, reactions and emotions. Last time I checked, toys and props didn't have feelings. Triangles have three sides!
You do what ever the heck you want to do in your bedroom.
What ever blows your hair back.
In case you are looking for traders, not interested.
Why does it have to be with another woman? I'd only have a threesome with another man, but not with another woman.
Because so many of the conservative, closeminded women (especially) on Y!A can't imagine doing anything like it, so it must be evil.
Generally one person becomes attached to the 3rd party and that's when the trouble begins...
I think you should do whatever floats your boat...
It's not harmful. That is the best arrangement in any marriage.
if it's something you both want and feel that your relationship will be fine afterward, then there is no problem=enjoy!
To each his /her own... if you as a couple are in agreement, then go for it and I hope it is as hot as it sounds.
Go have one and let me know how it turns out.
because its a) cheating b) being unfaithful to your vows c) if the female was gay she should never have gotten married d) if the man wanted to cheat he should have never gotten married e) its unsafe f) can get a STD g) it makes sex with each other seem less desireable h) its the highway to divorce i) your children (if any) dont need sl*ts for parents. j) word eventually gets around k) you get the well i cheated with you so i can cheat with out you l) where is the love between you two k) shall i go on???? i prob can make it thru the alphabet. if u want to chea go get divorced .
My pregnant wife and i are having a major argument that is threatening to ruin the marriage, so who's right?
My wife thinks a postage stamp should go on the envelope before you seal the envelope, and i think it should go on after you seal the envelope. Who's right?My pregnant wife and i are having a major argument that is threatening to ruin the marriage, so who's right?
You are both wrong. Use email.My pregnant wife and i are having a major argument that is threatening to ruin the marriage, so who's right?
I think each of you can decide for yourself and only for yourself when the postage stamp goes on the envelope. Were you to not think this a good solution, then I think you may want to consider divorcing her so you can pay child (after the child is born) and spousal support and she and you can put the stamp on any envelope whenever you want and not argue about it any more. This is a drastic solution but will get you the satisfaction of allowing yourself to put the stamp on an envelope whenever you want as long as it is in the upper right hand corner of the envelope. The best solution is to allow whomever is putting the stamp on the envelope to put it on whenever one wants to put it. This is called negotiation and reaching a compromise. It works, and I suggest you compromise with her on this and not make a big deal out of it. Were this to be a threat and create the possibility that your marriage may be ruined because of it, I tend to think that there may be other problems with your marriage that are more important than this problem and those problems need to be looked at in greater detail, as there doesn't need to be a major argument over such a petty thing as when does a postage stamp go on an envelope. Get real, and get your marriage back on track.
What a significant waste of stamps if you put them on and then mess up sealing the envelope.
With the new self adhesive stamps you cannot get them back off and reuse them like the old ones.
I do not think that I could remain married to a person who is so wastefully intractable about this issue.
Perhaps it is time to leave before the baby comes and you get to bond.
It will make it easier that way.
Really, a stamp is threatening to ruin the marriage! Maker her happy on this one, you've got diaper changing and 3am feedings to worry about!
There's no right or wrong in this situation. It doesn't matter when you put the stamp on it as long as it's on there before you put it in the mailbox.
it does not matter ? ! - and if you really feel that something so not important can ruin your marriage
you are both looking for an easy way out
You are. But she will never be convinced of it. Pregnant woman are a nightmare.
You are. Everyone knows it should go on after it is sealed.
Just concede to her.
You are both wrong. Use email.My pregnant wife and i are having a major argument that is threatening to ruin the marriage, so who's right?
I think each of you can decide for yourself and only for yourself when the postage stamp goes on the envelope. Were you to not think this a good solution, then I think you may want to consider divorcing her so you can pay child (after the child is born) and spousal support and she and you can put the stamp on any envelope whenever you want and not argue about it any more. This is a drastic solution but will get you the satisfaction of allowing yourself to put the stamp on an envelope whenever you want as long as it is in the upper right hand corner of the envelope. The best solution is to allow whomever is putting the stamp on the envelope to put it on whenever one wants to put it. This is called negotiation and reaching a compromise. It works, and I suggest you compromise with her on this and not make a big deal out of it. Were this to be a threat and create the possibility that your marriage may be ruined because of it, I tend to think that there may be other problems with your marriage that are more important than this problem and those problems need to be looked at in greater detail, as there doesn't need to be a major argument over such a petty thing as when does a postage stamp go on an envelope. Get real, and get your marriage back on track.
What a significant waste of stamps if you put them on and then mess up sealing the envelope.
With the new self adhesive stamps you cannot get them back off and reuse them like the old ones.
I do not think that I could remain married to a person who is so wastefully intractable about this issue.
Perhaps it is time to leave before the baby comes and you get to bond.
It will make it easier that way.
Really, a stamp is threatening to ruin the marriage! Maker her happy on this one, you've got diaper changing and 3am feedings to worry about!
There's no right or wrong in this situation. It doesn't matter when you put the stamp on it as long as it's on there before you put it in the mailbox.
it does not matter ? ! - and if you really feel that something so not important can ruin your marriage
you are both looking for an easy way out
You are. But she will never be convinced of it. Pregnant woman are a nightmare.
You are. Everyone knows it should go on after it is sealed.
Just concede to her.
I am Catholic but was married outside the church. Can I still receive the sacrament of marriage?
My husband is protestant and we intend to remain married. I regret now that I wasn't married in the church/tradition I grew up in and was wondering if it's still possible to receive the sacrament of marriage?I am Catholic but was married outside the church. Can I still receive the sacrament of marriage?
Yes, all you have to do is have your marriage convalidated, then you can receive all the other sacraments. Some people call it having your marraige blessed but that is inaccurate. Your marraige is already blessed. Your husband does not have to convert, but he will have to agree to raise the children Catholic. There are too many reasons to fully explain all the teaching behind the practice in just a few paragraphs, but that answers your question in a nut shell.
here are some resosurces for you:
Bringing Your Marriage Into the Church
http://www.americancatholic.org/newslett鈥?/a>
How to have a marriage convalidated or acknowledged in the Catholic Church
http://www.ehow.com/how_4615814_marriage鈥?/a>
It would be a good idea to attend Mass when you can, and make an appointment to talk to the priest.
Welcome home:)I am Catholic but was married outside the church. Can I still receive the sacrament of marriage?
The cure for this situation is to just be married. The first marriage according to Catholic Doctrine is doubtfully valid, many versions of the ceremony exist and you might not be able to get a copy of the words used in it.
If the Protestant party intends to not convert, then the ceremony is not held in the church, but in the sacristy to the side, if there is one.
Of course, the Conciliarists have rewritten the Canon Laws in 1983, twenty years after they had already been changing the sacramental matter and form, so perhaps they also changed what Trent says on lawful matrimonial ceremonies.
I was married in a catholic church, my hubby has no religion(he believes he just doesnt have a religion). I had to go to a class and then I could get married in the church..talk to the Father at your church...you may just have to get re-married. Your hubby doesn't have to convert...but if he loves you he should get married in a church so that you will feel better about yourself. Maybe you can just have a simple small ceremony to pacify the church.
I'm not positive, but I think he needs to be Catholic, too, in order for it to be considered a sacrament in the Church. Don't hold me to this, because I'm not sure...
I think the Catechism of the Catholic Church is online somewhere, I would definitely go check that out and see what it says.
Best of luck!
The Church probably already recognizes your marriage. It can and will bless the marriage bond that already exists.
This is called a Convalidation of Marriage. Here is an article about the steps involved: http://www.americancatholic.org/Newslett鈥?/a>
Talk to your parish priest to get the process started.
For more information, see the Code of Canon Law, paragraphs 1156 and following: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__鈥?/a>
With love and prayers in Christ.
They will probably require you to take marriage encounter/counseling classes first. It was required last I heard of any couple marrying in the Church. Best bet though is checking with your local parish. They might wave that part if you have been together for awhile.
Yes you can still be married in the Church, since the Church does not see you as married currently. A Catholic can marry a non-Catholic in the Catholic Church. It happens all the time.
Sure it is, possible. As long as you have no impediments to marriage, you can have your marriage blessed and recognized by the Church. Pax Christi
Yes of course you can.All you must do is have you and your Husband meet with the Priest and make arrangements to have your marriage blessed and confirmed in the Catholic Church.
Just go talk to the priest have your marriage blessed then you can receive the sacraments.Yes you can get married again in the church.
So you're asking if believing in one false myth lets you join in an imaginary cerimony with someone believing in another false myth? mmmm...let's see now...ok...here's my answer....who cares?
So why are you now in such a tizzy? You kinda answered your own question, which shows how much of a cult the Catholicism really is! You are suppose to have a ';relationship'; with Jesus, not a traditional dog and pony show! Get over it, and love your hubby, and Jesus, I did the same thing, the ONLY reason was to get my folks off my back, just made a mess of our relationship, wasn't worth it at all!.Brought no glory to The Lord, just my folks to save face in the church.
Yes, all you have to do is have your marriage convalidated, then you can receive all the other sacraments. Some people call it having your marraige blessed but that is inaccurate. Your marraige is already blessed. Your husband does not have to convert, but he will have to agree to raise the children Catholic. There are too many reasons to fully explain all the teaching behind the practice in just a few paragraphs, but that answers your question in a nut shell.
here are some resosurces for you:
Bringing Your Marriage Into the Church
http://www.americancatholic.org/newslett鈥?/a>
How to have a marriage convalidated or acknowledged in the Catholic Church
http://www.ehow.com/how_4615814_marriage鈥?/a>
It would be a good idea to attend Mass when you can, and make an appointment to talk to the priest.
Welcome home:)I am Catholic but was married outside the church. Can I still receive the sacrament of marriage?
The cure for this situation is to just be married. The first marriage according to Catholic Doctrine is doubtfully valid, many versions of the ceremony exist and you might not be able to get a copy of the words used in it.
If the Protestant party intends to not convert, then the ceremony is not held in the church, but in the sacristy to the side, if there is one.
Of course, the Conciliarists have rewritten the Canon Laws in 1983, twenty years after they had already been changing the sacramental matter and form, so perhaps they also changed what Trent says on lawful matrimonial ceremonies.
I was married in a catholic church, my hubby has no religion(he believes he just doesnt have a religion). I had to go to a class and then I could get married in the church..talk to the Father at your church...you may just have to get re-married. Your hubby doesn't have to convert...but if he loves you he should get married in a church so that you will feel better about yourself. Maybe you can just have a simple small ceremony to pacify the church.
I'm not positive, but I think he needs to be Catholic, too, in order for it to be considered a sacrament in the Church. Don't hold me to this, because I'm not sure...
I think the Catechism of the Catholic Church is online somewhere, I would definitely go check that out and see what it says.
Best of luck!
The Church probably already recognizes your marriage. It can and will bless the marriage bond that already exists.
This is called a Convalidation of Marriage. Here is an article about the steps involved: http://www.americancatholic.org/Newslett鈥?/a>
Talk to your parish priest to get the process started.
For more information, see the Code of Canon Law, paragraphs 1156 and following: http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG1104/__鈥?/a>
With love and prayers in Christ.
They will probably require you to take marriage encounter/counseling classes first. It was required last I heard of any couple marrying in the Church. Best bet though is checking with your local parish. They might wave that part if you have been together for awhile.
Yes you can still be married in the Church, since the Church does not see you as married currently. A Catholic can marry a non-Catholic in the Catholic Church. It happens all the time.
Sure it is, possible. As long as you have no impediments to marriage, you can have your marriage blessed and recognized by the Church. Pax Christi
Yes of course you can.All you must do is have you and your Husband meet with the Priest and make arrangements to have your marriage blessed and confirmed in the Catholic Church.
Just go talk to the priest have your marriage blessed then you can receive the sacraments.Yes you can get married again in the church.
So you're asking if believing in one false myth lets you join in an imaginary cerimony with someone believing in another false myth? mmmm...let's see now...ok...here's my answer....who cares?
So why are you now in such a tizzy? You kinda answered your own question, which shows how much of a cult the Catholicism really is! You are suppose to have a ';relationship'; with Jesus, not a traditional dog and pony show! Get over it, and love your hubby, and Jesus, I did the same thing, the ONLY reason was to get my folks off my back, just made a mess of our relationship, wasn't worth it at all!.Brought no glory to The Lord, just my folks to save face in the church.
Since the churches have lost the battle vs. gay marriage, should they move on to divorce and adultery?
It's clear, with the newest decision in Iowa, that gay marriage is inevitably coming to America. My question is, should the churches now pull their resources to introduce laws banning divorce and adultery? It seems to me that we need to protect marriage.Since the churches have lost the battle vs. gay marriage, should they move on to divorce and adultery?
It's always been my view that Christians need to work FOR things more than they need to work AGAINST them. Should be begin working for things Jesus told us to do, like feed his sheep, preach the Good News, love one another?Since the churches have lost the battle vs. gay marriage, should they move on to divorce and adultery?
Screw it, people should be able to live their lives how they want. Some marriages just don't work, and a woman or man should have every right to leave his marriage for everyone's sake. Some women also marry abusive men because of underlying psychological issues, but they should be given the opportunity to walk away from that lifestyle whenever they wish.
The problem with divorce is that people don't think first before they marry. One girl at my high school is dropping out after junior year to marry a guy she'd met a couple months ago.
The Christian church has not lost any battle. Any Christian who believes the bible should be interpreted literally and believes the word of the Lord, will never lose the battle. We as Christians are to live in the world but not of the world. Even if every state were to adopt gay marriage, it doesn't mean that we any more accept it as moral living. It is those who buy into the homosexual agenda that is on the losing battle. If a person chooses to live in sin and is unrepentant, they don't gain anything but an eternity in hell. They sadly are the losers.
You seem to be pretty far behind the times.
Laws against divorce and adultery were struck down long before you were born.
They were found to be unconstitutional long ago, so the chances that they will be reinstated are slim and none.
And rightfully so, I might add.
Those involved in the gay agenda would love to make everyone think that only Christians are against gay marriage, when in truth it is most Americans. The issue of gay marriage is far from lost. Banning divorce would be unbiblical and Adultery is already a sin
Giving up and saying ';sin'; is ok, just because the law says it's alright is not right in my eyes. God sets the moral standard in my family. Not the law. That includes our concern for divorce and adultery.
That battle was lost around 30 years ago...
Perhaps you should keep your marriage in accordance with your beliefs, and keep your beliefs out of the legal system.
Never give up on the gay issue. Love the sinner not the sin.
I don't know what you are talking about? The Church I attend has never attacked gays or divorced folks. The point is people need Jesus Christ in their lives.
It isn't lost yet, partner.
It's always been my view that Christians need to work FOR things more than they need to work AGAINST them. Should be begin working for things Jesus told us to do, like feed his sheep, preach the Good News, love one another?Since the churches have lost the battle vs. gay marriage, should they move on to divorce and adultery?
Screw it, people should be able to live their lives how they want. Some marriages just don't work, and a woman or man should have every right to leave his marriage for everyone's sake. Some women also marry abusive men because of underlying psychological issues, but they should be given the opportunity to walk away from that lifestyle whenever they wish.
The problem with divorce is that people don't think first before they marry. One girl at my high school is dropping out after junior year to marry a guy she'd met a couple months ago.
The Christian church has not lost any battle. Any Christian who believes the bible should be interpreted literally and believes the word of the Lord, will never lose the battle. We as Christians are to live in the world but not of the world. Even if every state were to adopt gay marriage, it doesn't mean that we any more accept it as moral living. It is those who buy into the homosexual agenda that is on the losing battle. If a person chooses to live in sin and is unrepentant, they don't gain anything but an eternity in hell. They sadly are the losers.
You seem to be pretty far behind the times.
Laws against divorce and adultery were struck down long before you were born.
They were found to be unconstitutional long ago, so the chances that they will be reinstated are slim and none.
And rightfully so, I might add.
Those involved in the gay agenda would love to make everyone think that only Christians are against gay marriage, when in truth it is most Americans. The issue of gay marriage is far from lost. Banning divorce would be unbiblical and Adultery is already a sin
Giving up and saying ';sin'; is ok, just because the law says it's alright is not right in my eyes. God sets the moral standard in my family. Not the law. That includes our concern for divorce and adultery.
That battle was lost around 30 years ago...
Perhaps you should keep your marriage in accordance with your beliefs, and keep your beliefs out of the legal system.
Never give up on the gay issue. Love the sinner not the sin.
I don't know what you are talking about? The Church I attend has never attacked gays or divorced folks. The point is people need Jesus Christ in their lives.
It isn't lost yet, partner.
Is it mandatory to wear only gold jwellery in marriage reception?For fancy look cant one try artificial jwlry?
I want to mix and match my jwellery to make the look come out of conventional look.Can I wear gold plated silver or artificial jwellery on my reception day?Is it mandatory to wear only gold jwellery in marriage reception?For fancy look cant one try artificial jwlry?
Not at all.....
Not only gold but you can also try:
diamond, precious stones, platinum, silver and if you are not comfortable go for ethnic artificial jewelery...All d best!Is it mandatory to wear only gold jwellery in marriage reception?For fancy look cant one try artificial jwlry?
ofcourse you can try artificial jewelry.
Dhruvika
http://www.myjewelersplace.com
ya ya u can wear reception isnot more important it is just show off thats it the main think that should be gold is MANGALYAM ok u can opt for any its your wish just choose a goog one which matches u r reception costume
Yes you can not all ';real'; jewellry looks good
But if you find the perfect artificial jewellry and it doesn't look to cheap or cheesy nothing wrong with wearing it
none is preventing you. it is for you mto decide
Gold shows ur richness
no its not at all compulsory
Not at all.....
Not only gold but you can also try:
diamond, precious stones, platinum, silver and if you are not comfortable go for ethnic artificial jewelery...All d best!Is it mandatory to wear only gold jwellery in marriage reception?For fancy look cant one try artificial jwlry?
ofcourse you can try artificial jewelry.
Dhruvika
http://www.myjewelersplace.com
ya ya u can wear reception isnot more important it is just show off thats it the main think that should be gold is MANGALYAM ok u can opt for any its your wish just choose a goog one which matches u r reception costume
Yes you can not all ';real'; jewellry looks good
But if you find the perfect artificial jewellry and it doesn't look to cheap or cheesy nothing wrong with wearing it
none is preventing you. it is for you mto decide
Gold shows ur richness
no its not at all compulsory
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)